Architects` fees
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; (1995) EGCS 24(1) (25/2/95)Publication details: 1995Subject(s): Summary: "Munkenbeck & Marshall v McAlpine" CA 15 February 1995. In a claim by architects for unpaid fees for alteration work to a flat, costs were awarded on an indemnity basis against the defendant, who claimed that the work was not finished when the architects` services were terminated so fees should be charged on a lower basis.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB3109-07 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 15370-1001 |
"Munkenbeck & Marshall v McAlpine" CA 15 February 1995. In a claim by architects for unpaid fees for alteration work to a flat, costs were awarded on an indemnity basis against the defendant, who claimed that the work was not finished when the architects` services were terminated so fees should be charged on a lower basis.