Construction adjudication draft decisions and apparent bias [electronic resource]
Language: English Series: Law-Now ArticlePublication details: London CMS Cameron McKenna LLP 2011Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Explains the two primary grounds on which the courts will refuse to uphold an adjudicator's decision - where the adjudicator lacked or exceeded his jurisdiction and where the adjudicator's decision or the adjudication itself was affected by a failure to afford natural justice. Looks at Lanes v Galliford Try which is the first reported instance of its kind in adjudication and highlights the dangers of adjudicators expressing preliminary views on matters before they have heard the full arguments of the parties.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Book | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 153412-2001 |
Explains the two primary grounds on which the courts will refuse to uphold an adjudicator's decision - where the adjudicator lacked or exceeded his jurisdiction and where the adjudicator's decision or the adjudication itself was affected by a failure to afford natural justice. Looks at Lanes v Galliford Try which is the first reported instance of its kind in adjudication and highlights the dangers of adjudicators expressing preliminary views on matters before they have heard the full arguments of the parties.