Image from Google Jackets

Seeckts v Derwent

Publication details: 2004Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2004] EWCA Civ 293, 30 March 2004. Dispute between the defendants (D) and the claimant (S) over a hedge between their properties. D appealed against the County Court decision that S was the owner of the hedge destroyed by D, the grant awarding damages to S and an injunction to restrain further trespass by D. The properties had been divided in 1968 by a conveyance and ownership of the hedge rested on a map from that conveyance. The County Court had decided that ownership of the hedge was determined by T-marks but D contended that not enough weight had been given to the dimensions in the map. "Held": that there was a hedge on the boundary and that the T-marks are normally understood to represent a boundary. The dimensions from the map were probably intended to provide a general indication of the boundary. Appeal dismissed. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article ABS67684 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 125780-1001
Law report Virtual Online ONLINE (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 125780-2001

[2004] EWCA Civ 293, 30 March 2004. Dispute between the defendants (D) and the claimant (S) over a hedge between their properties. D appealed against the County Court decision that S was the owner of the hedge destroyed by D, the grant awarding damages to S and an injunction to restrain further trespass by D. The properties had been divided in 1968 by a conveyance and ownership of the hedge rested on a map from that conveyance. The County Court had decided that ownership of the hedge was determined by T-marks but D contended that not enough weight had been given to the dimensions in the map. "Held": that there was a hedge on the boundary and that the T-marks are normally understood to represent a boundary. The dimensions from the map were probably intended to provide a general indication of the boundary. Appeal dismissed. View judgment at www.courtservice.gov.uk.