Confidentiality cannot always be guaranteed
Series: Estates Gazette ; (0449) 4 December 2004, 126-128(3)Publication details: 2004Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: Defines and clarifies differences between disclosure and privilege using examples of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 scenarios as illustrations. Discusses the implications of "Three Rivers DC v Bank of England" ([2004] UKHL 48) which clearly defines the boundaries relating to legal advice privilege. Warns that confidentiality cannot always be guaranteed. View judgment at www.publications.parliament.uk.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS68559 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 128274-1001 |
Defines and clarifies differences between disclosure and privilege using examples of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 scenarios as illustrations. Discusses the implications of "Three Rivers DC v Bank of England" ([2004] UKHL 48) which clearly defines the boundaries relating to legal advice privilege. Warns that confidentiality cannot always be guaranteed. View judgment at www.publications.parliament.uk.