KPMG LLP v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd
Language: English Subject(s): Online resources: Summary: [2006] EWHC 67 (Ch), 31 January 2006. Considered three issues: whether K enjoyed a free-standing right to break a reversionary sub-underlease; whether N was entitled to have the reversionary sub-underlease rectified due to a unilateral mistake, and if N was entitled to have the reversionary sub-underlease rectified due to a mutual mistake. "Held" : Judgment in favour of N. N was entitled to rectify a reversionary sub- underlease to include words that had been omitted from the original underlease.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | Virtual Online | ONLINE PUBLICATION (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 133095-1001 |
[2006] EWHC 67 (Ch), 31 January 2006. Considered three issues: whether K enjoyed a free-standing right to break a reversionary sub-underlease; whether N was entitled to have the reversionary sub-underlease rectified due to a unilateral mistake, and if N was entitled to have the reversionary sub-underlease rectified due to a mutual mistake. "Held" : Judgment in favour of N. N was entitled to rectify a reversionary sub- underlease to include words that had been omitted from the original underlease.