Image from Google Jackets

Possession

Language: English Series: EGCS ; 1990 75Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In " Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell " CA 8 June 1990, it was held that under the Rent Act 1977 a notice satisfying Case 16(b) of Schedule 15 does not have to be in a specific form.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
News article London News article WB2624-19 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 19172-1001

In " Springfield Investments Ltd v Bell " CA 8 June 1990, it was held that under the Rent Act 1977 a notice satisfying Case 16(b) of Schedule 15 does not have to be in a specific form.