Cadogan and others v Royal Brompton Hospital National Health Trust
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; [1996] 37 EG 142-144(3)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: ChD 9 May 1996. The predecessor in title to the plaintiff trustees (C) gave land to the trustees of the Chelsea Hospital for Women. The indenture was subject to two restrictive covenants: the land was not to be used for any other purposes except for the hospital and no building could be erected until the external elevations had been approved by the Cadogan Estate. C sought declarations that the covenants were enforceable against the hospital. "Held" C dissentitled from enforcing the first covenant by an injunction but can restrain the defendant from erecting a building as long as it is not for a statutory purpose.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55883 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 19416-1001 |
ChD 9 May 1996. The predecessor in title to the plaintiff trustees (C) gave land to the trustees of the Chelsea Hospital for Women. The indenture was subject to two restrictive covenants: the land was not to be used for any other purposes except for the hospital and no building could be erected until the external elevations had been approved by the Cadogan Estate. C sought declarations that the covenants were enforceable against the hospital. "Held" C dissentitled from enforcing the first covenant by an injunction but can restrain the defendant from erecting a building as long as it is not for a statutory purpose.