Heseldon (Trading as James Shoesmith) v Lancashire CC
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; [1996] RVR 220-224(5)Publication details: 1996Subject(s): Summary: LT 18 March 1996. The claimant had been the proprietor of a business for about 22 years, the premises had been in continuous use as a glaziers for over 121 years. The property was compulsorily purchased by the council. At dispute was the amount of compensation for removal, temporary loss of profit and the unsuitability of premises the claimant moved to.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS55968 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 20175-1001 |
LT 18 March 1996. The claimant had been the proprietor of a business for about 22 years, the premises had been in continuous use as a glaziers for over 121 years. The property was compulsorily purchased by the council. At dispute was the amount of compensation for removal, temporary loss of profit and the unsuitability of premises the claimant moved to.