Stradbroke (Earl of) v Mitchell
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1989) 49 EG 59-64(5)Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: ChD 14 July 1989. The landlord (S) served notice on the tenant of two farms (M) to quit and deliver up possession as from 11 October 1989. S contended that no counternotice requiring arbitration had been served; M contended that the notice to quit was not a valid notice. S sought a declaration that the tenancy would duly determine; M sought a declaration that a valid notice requiring arbitration had been given and an injunction restraining S from enforcing the notice to quit. The matter was concluded in favour of M, that the notice to quit was fraudulent; there was evidence that S knew that M was not in breach of the tenancy.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS41869 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 33121-1001 |
ChD 14 July 1989. The landlord (S) served notice on the tenant of two farms (M) to quit and deliver up possession as from 11 October 1989. S contended that no counternotice requiring arbitration had been served; M contended that the notice to quit was not a valid notice. S sought a declaration that the tenancy would duly determine; M sought a declaration that a valid notice requiring arbitration had been given and an injunction restraining S from enforcing the notice to quit. The matter was concluded in favour of M, that the notice to quit was fraudulent; there was evidence that S knew that M was not in breach of the tenancy.