User clause
Language: English Series: EGCS ; (1991) 69Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Montross Associated Investments SA v Mousaieff and another CA 27 June 1991. The lessors claimed a breach of the user clause because the tenants were not using the premises for the business of retailing jewellery, as specified in the user clause, but only for the administration of such a business conducted at another address. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2727-23 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 34379-1001 |
Montross Associated Investments SA v Mousaieff and another CA 27 June 1991. The lessors claimed a breach of the user clause because the tenants were not using the premises for the business of retailing jewellery, as specified in the user clause, but only for the administration of such a business conducted at another address. Appeal dismissed.