Paul v Newham LBC
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; 1990 RVR 64-68(5)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: LT 16 November 1989. Following the council (N) compulsorily purchasing P`s property, which was divided into two flats , tenants moved out and were rehoused. P sought compensation on the basis of vacant possession but N calculated compensation at sitting tenant value. LT held that compensation was payable on the basis of sitting tenant value because the tenants were forced to move out as a result of compulsory purchase and the council had a duty to rehouse them. Also it was remembered that compulsory acquisition was a process and not an event so the fact that the tenants were rehoused before the council could take possession of the property did not contribute to P`s case.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS42507 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 37344-1001 |
LT 16 November 1989. Following the council (N) compulsorily purchasing P`s property, which was divided into two flats , tenants moved out and were rehoused. P sought compensation on the basis of vacant possession but N calculated compensation at sitting tenant value. LT held that compensation was payable on the basis of sitting tenant value because the tenants were forced to move out as a result of compulsory purchase and the council had a duty to rehouse them. Also it was remembered that compulsory acquisition was a process and not an event so the fact that the tenants were rehoused before the council could take possession of the property did not contribute to P`s case.