Crown Business Centre Ltd v Butterfield (VO)
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; (1990) 30 RVR 170-173(3)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: LT 21 May 1990. Ratepayers were claiming that due to severe disrepair and penetrating damp the unused lower floor should have no value for rating purposes. LT however held that, despite the fact that the landlord had refused to make the necessary repairs the defect was capable of being remedied. If the landlord completed repairs, a rent of £430 could be secured giving a rateable value of £330.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS43580 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 42423-1001 |
LT 21 May 1990. Ratepayers were claiming that due to severe disrepair and penetrating damp the unused lower floor should have no value for rating purposes. LT however held that, despite the fact that the landlord had refused to make the necessary repairs the defect was capable of being remedied. If the landlord completed repairs, a rent of £430 could be secured giving a rateable value of £330.