Sharkey and Another v SOS Environment and another
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1990) 45 EG 113-118(4)Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: QBD 11 May 1990. Application by (S) for judicial review under Acquisition of Land Act 1981 s23 on the grounds that Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s112(1)(b) did not provide the necessary authorisation to stop a compulsory purchase order . This had been made after enforcement notices and injunctions had failed to have any effect. Attempt to remove development considered to be unsuitable for metropolitan greenbelt . S argued that s112(1)(b) authorised acquisition of land required for a purpose. It was held that this case was covered by s112(1)(b) and that restoration of the land was unlikely unless order confirmed. However, the judge did state that in his opinion the order may have been a little premature. Applications dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS43655 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 42795-1001 |
QBD 11 May 1990. Application by (S) for judicial review under Acquisition of Land Act 1981 s23 on the grounds that Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s112(1)(b) did not provide the necessary authorisation to stop a compulsory purchase order . This had been made after enforcement notices and injunctions had failed to have any effect. Attempt to remove development considered to be unsuitable for metropolitan greenbelt . S argued that s112(1)(b) authorised acquisition of land required for a purpose. It was held that this case was covered by s112(1)(b) and that restoration of the land was unlikely unless order confirmed. However, the judge did state that in his opinion the order may have been a little premature. Applications dismissed.