Creear v Fearon and another
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1994) 46 EG 202-205(4)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: CA 23 June 1994. X occupied an agricultural holding between 1972 and 2 February 1991 when a notice to quit, served on them by Y, expired. In 1975 X erected a milk bale on the holding. During 1983, the relevant period for the purposes of Agriculture Act 1986, Sch 1, rent payable was at a low level of £400pa. Proceedings to determine compensation payable by Y to X in relation to X`s fraction of the value of the registered milk quota, decided that the rental value of X`s dairy improvements and fixed equipment, which should fall to be disregarded pursuant to Sch 1 para 7, can be ascertained as a figure on its own. Y appealed, contending that the actual open market value of the holding in 1983 must be considered. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS51778 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 43721-1001 |
CA 23 June 1994. X occupied an agricultural holding between 1972 and 2 February 1991 when a notice to quit, served on them by Y, expired. In 1975 X erected a milk bale on the holding. During 1983, the relevant period for the purposes of Agriculture Act 1986, Sch 1, rent payable was at a low level of £400pa. Proceedings to determine compensation payable by Y to X in relation to X`s fraction of the value of the registered milk quota, decided that the rental value of X`s dairy improvements and fixed equipment, which should fall to be disregarded pursuant to Sch 1 para 7, can be ascertained as a figure on its own. Y appealed, contending that the actual open market value of the holding in 1983 must be considered. Appeal dismissed.