Misdescription
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette Case Summaries ; 1992 EGCS 20(1) (22 February 1992)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: "Toplis v Green" CA 14 February 1992 concerned a dispute over a strip of land adjacent to property sold and the vendor farmers claim for trespass and damages. In dismissing the purchasers appeal alleging that the high court had wrongly allowed evidence extrinsic to plan, it was held that although the plan was not accurate it was annexed to the transfer and the purchasers had clearly seen where the boundary lay. the allegation of a breach of duty of care by the vendor was also dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2809-44 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 44218-1001 |
"Toplis v Green" CA 14 February 1992 concerned a dispute over a strip of land adjacent to property sold and the vendor farmers claim for trespass and damages. In dismissing the purchasers appeal alleging that the high court had wrongly allowed evidence extrinsic to plan, it was held that although the plan was not accurate it was annexed to the transfer and the purchasers had clearly seen where the boundary lay. the allegation of a breach of duty of care by the vendor was also dismissed.