An ambiguity opens up the question of site possession
Language: English Series: Contract Journal ; 16 April 1987, 12(1)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: With reference to caselaw the author disagrees with the view expressed in the February Construction Law Digest that the insurance amendments to JCT 80 have brought about a fundamental change to the contractor`s right to possession of the site because of new clause 23.3.1, He argues that the position is unchanged by the new clause.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS37570 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 5293-1001 |
With reference to caselaw the author disagrees with the view expressed in the February Construction Law Digest that the insurance amendments to JCT 80 have brought about a fundamental change to the contractor`s right to possession of the site because of new clause 23.3.1, He argues that the position is unchanged by the new clause.