Image from Google Jackets

Anscombe and Ringland Ltd v Watson and others

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1991) 38 EG 230(1)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: Mayor`s and City of London Court, 2 November 1990. The plaintiffs (A) received instructions from solicitors representing the defendant (W) to sell a flat. The solicitors mentioned that a Mr E was ineterested in the property and in fact he eventually completed the purchase. In October 1988 A's instructions, including sole agency, were agreed. A contacted Mr E, who after being shown around the flat by A's representative, made an offer of £300,000. This offer was rejected and A instructions were terminated. Mr E was informed but he did not lose interest making a further appointment with A to view the flat, A having retained the key due to an oversight by W. W were aware of this and by a letter dated January 1989 confirmed withdrawal of instructions from A, stating that they were placing the property with other agents, B. Mr E contacted the new agents with an offer of £340,000. This sale was completed. A requested commission which was refused. Judgement was given for the defendants.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS45343 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 52455-1001

Mayor`s and City of London Court, 2 November 1990. The plaintiffs (A) received instructions from solicitors representing the defendant (W) to sell a flat. The solicitors mentioned that a Mr E was ineterested in the property and in fact he eventually completed the purchase. In October 1988 A's instructions, including sole agency, were agreed. A contacted Mr E, who after being shown around the flat by A's representative, made an offer of £300,000. This offer was rejected and A instructions were terminated. Mr E was informed but he did not lose interest making a further appointment with A to view the flat, A having retained the key due to an oversight by W. W were aware of this and by a letter dated January 1989 confirmed withdrawal of instructions from A, stating that they were placing the property with other agents, B. Mr E contacted the new agents with an offer of £340,000. This sale was completed. A requested commission which was refused. Judgement was given for the defendants.