Fletcher v Chelmsford BC
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 1991 45 EG 191-192(2)Publication details: 1991Subject(s): Summary: LT (REF/6/1991) 22 July 1991. Claim for compensation under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s174 (1990 Act s203) for the cost of taking expert advice and monitoring a tree, subject to a tree preservation order, which was causing structural danger to a house. C claimed that any loss was too remote to be compensatable. Refers to "Bollans v Surrey" 1968. LT ruled that the claimant had acted reasonably in taking expert advice. Claim for cost of report and monitoring allowed in full.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS45495 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 53387-1001 |
LT (REF/6/1991) 22 July 1991. Claim for compensation under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 s174 (1990 Act s203) for the cost of taking expert advice and monitoring a tree, subject to a tree preservation order, which was causing structural danger to a house. C claimed that any loss was too remote to be compensatable. Refers to "Bollans v Surrey" 1968. LT ruled that the claimant had acted reasonably in taking expert advice. Claim for cost of report and monitoring allowed in full.