Etheridge and another v SoS for the Environment and another
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; (1992) JPL 31-39(9)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: QBD 8 March 1991. Appeal from inspector`s decision to uphold a refusal of planning permission for demolition of an existing building and erection of an office building with basement car park. Inspector concluded that under Development Control Policy Note 5 (DCPN 5) the development could be prejudicial to a future proposed retail centre and public multi-storey car park. QBD held, allowing the appeal, that the inspector had misinterpreted DCPN 5 which stated that permission may be refused for private development which conflicts with public proposals, but only if firm proposals exist which it is intended to carry out within a definite period.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS45972 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 56122-1001 |
QBD 8 March 1991. Appeal from inspector`s decision to uphold a refusal of planning permission for demolition of an existing building and erection of an office building with basement car park. Inspector concluded that under Development Control Policy Note 5 (DCPN 5) the development could be prejudicial to a future proposed retail centre and public multi-storey car park. QBD held, allowing the appeal, that the inspector had misinterpreted DCPN 5 which stated that permission may be refused for private development which conflicts with public proposals, but only if firm proposals exist which it is intended to carry out within a definite period.