Injunction requires reinstatement of wall
Language: English Series: Times ; 15/5/90 p21Publication details: 1990Subject(s): Summary: In Cadogan and another v Muscatt , CA 14 May 1990, it was held that the lowering of a parapet wall carried out by a tenant in flagrant breach of a negative covenant , entitled the landlords to summary judgement against him under Order 14 of the Supreme Court Rules. A mandatory injunction requiring the tenant to reinstate the brickwork was property made.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News article | London News article | WB2619-45 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 57677-1001 |
In Cadogan and another v Muscatt , CA 14 May 1990, it was held that the lowering of a parapet wall carried out by a tenant in flagrant breach of a negative covenant , entitled the landlords to summary judgement against him under Order 14 of the Supreme Court Rules. A mandatory injunction requiring the tenant to reinstate the brickwork was property made.