R v Newbury DC ex parte Stevens and Partridge
Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; 1992 JPL 1056-1064(5)Publication details: 1992Subject(s): Summary: QBD 13 March 1992. Outline planning permission was granted for the construction of a hotel, sports facilities and link road. Conditions were attatched to the permission requiring the submission of full details of the layout, siting and design of the buildings, access and landscaping within three years. A separate condition provided for a landscaping scheme. The applicants, S, did not submit an application for reserved matters until March 1988. The planning authority had however changed their minds about the suitability of the scheme. In October 1988 the Director of Planning Services wrote to S saying that the landscaping details were unsatisfactory but that it proposed to issue the reserved matters consent with conditions relating to the submission of details of this scheme. In Autumn 1989 other developers sought planning consent on the site for housing. At the inquiry the council stated that S`s permission had lapsed as there had been no full approval of reserved matters within the| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS47315 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 61581-1001 |
QBD 13 March 1992. Outline planning permission was granted for the construction of a hotel, sports facilities and link road. Conditions were attatched to the permission requiring the submission of full details of the layout, siting and design of the buildings, access and landscaping within three years. A separate condition provided for a landscaping scheme. The applicants, S, did not submit an application for reserved matters until March 1988. The planning authority had however changed their minds about the suitability of the scheme. In October 1988 the Director of Planning Services wrote to S saying that the landscaping details were unsatisfactory but that it proposed to issue the reserved matters consent with conditions relating to the submission of details of this scheme. In Autumn 1989 other developers sought planning consent on the site for housing. At the inquiry the council stated that S`s permission had lapsed as there had been no full approval of reserved matters within the