Image from Google Jackets

Bostock v Tacher de la Pagerie

Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; 282(6335) 23 May 1987, 999-1001(2)Publication details: 1987Subject(s): Summary: CA 23 February 1987. An appeal by the tenant from a county court decision where the landlord, the present respondent, was awarded possession of a flat and 3,800 for rent arrears . The landlord bought the flat in 1983 and let it to the tenant for periods of two to six months at a time, the final period being to April 1985. The landlord intended to transfer the flat into the joint names of himself and daughter when she reached the age of 18, and she would live there. Proceedings for possession were brought under Rent Act 1977 schedule 15 case 9 on the ground that the flat was reasonably required for occupation by his daughter. The tenant appealed, the main ground being a point concerning the landlord`s title and the application of McIntyre v Hardcastle . If before the claim for possession, the property had been transferred into the joint names of landlord and daughter, then as a result of McIntyre v Hardcastle they could not obtain an order for possession for occupation for the daughte
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS37711 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 6359-1001

CA 23 February 1987. An appeal by the tenant from a county court decision where the landlord, the present respondent, was awarded possession of a flat and 3,800 for rent arrears . The landlord bought the flat in 1983 and let it to the tenant for periods of two to six months at a time, the final period being to April 1985. The landlord intended to transfer the flat into the joint names of himself and daughter when she reached the age of 18, and she would live there. Proceedings for possession were brought under Rent Act 1977 schedule 15 case 9 on the ground that the flat was reasonably required for occupation by his daughter. The tenant appealed, the main ground being a point concerning the landlord`s title and the application of McIntyre v Hardcastle . If before the claim for possession, the property had been transferred into the joint names of landlord and daughter, then as a result of McIntyre v Hardcastle they could not obtain an order for possession for occupation for the daughte