Allied Dunbar Assurance plc v Fowle and others
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1994) 25 EG 149-155(7)Publication details: 1994Subject(s): Summary: QBD 28 January 1994. Appeals brought against tenants by the landlord for not complying with the obligations as set out in a lease, resulting in arrears of rent, service charges and insurance premiums were dismissed on the grounds that the lease was deemed never to have vested in the Crown, hence the Crown cannot have disclaimed. The issues concerned whether or not the sureties liability was discharged by the Crown disclaimer of a lease, and whether the liability was revived on restoration of a dissolved company.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS50902 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 760-1001 |
QBD 28 January 1994. Appeals brought against tenants by the landlord for not complying with the obligations as set out in a lease, resulting in arrears of rent, service charges and insurance premiums were dismissed on the grounds that the lease was deemed never to have vested in the Crown, hence the Crown cannot have disclaimed. The issues concerned whether or not the sureties liability was discharged by the Crown disclaimer of a lease, and whether the liability was revived on restoration of a dissolved company.