Image from Google Jackets

North Wiltshire DC v SoS for the Environment and Clover

Language: English Series: Property and Compensation Reports ; (1993) 65 PCR 137-147(6)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: CA 12 April 1992. In September 1989 C applied for planning permission to build a house and garage on land within a walled garden. The council structure plan provided that in villages which lacked certain specified facilities, including the village in question, only very limited development would normally be permitted. Under the emerging local plan, in villages not shown on the proposals map only very limited residential development would be permitted, the village in question was not on the map. In 1980 a similar application for planning permission was dismissed on the grounds that it lay within an area that was not to be developed. In October 1990 the council refused the second application. C appealed. The inspector concluded that the garden and associated buildings formed one part of the village and the addition of a further house would not therefore conflict with the councils policies. On application under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 the judge held that the inspector had fai
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS48303 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 66062-1001

CA 12 April 1992. In September 1989 C applied for planning permission to build a house and garage on land within a walled garden. The council structure plan provided that in villages which lacked certain specified facilities, including the village in question, only very limited development would normally be permitted. Under the emerging local plan, in villages not shown on the proposals map only very limited residential development would be permitted, the village in question was not on the map. In 1980 a similar application for planning permission was dismissed on the grounds that it lay within an area that was not to be developed. In October 1990 the council refused the second application. C appealed. The inspector concluded that the garden and associated buildings formed one part of the village and the addition of a further house would not therefore conflict with the councils policies. On application under Town and Country Planning Act 1971 the judge held that the inspector had fai