Image from Google Jackets

Trafford V SoS for the Environment and Lake District Special Planning Board

Language: English Series: Journal of Planning and Environment Law ; 1993 JPL 236-242(4)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: 13D 21 February 1992. The Planning Board failed to determine an application for outline planning permission for partial demolition and conversion of farm buildings for residential use. The applicant, T, appealed. In its representations the board referred to the draft Local Plan which layed out their thinking on housing within the National Park. Reference was also made to the structure plan. T responded that little weight should be given to Local Plan as it needed to be modified to conform to the structure plan. The appeal was dismissed. T applied to the High Court under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288 on three points, that the Inspector had taken into account the draft local plan, that he had given too much weight to the structure plan policy and that he had taken into account another appeal before the SoS and that these three factors had vitiated the decision. The application was dismissed.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS48305 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 66076-1001

13D 21 February 1992. The Planning Board failed to determine an application for outline planning permission for partial demolition and conversion of farm buildings for residential use. The applicant, T, appealed. In its representations the board referred to the draft Local Plan which layed out their thinking on housing within the National Park. Reference was also made to the structure plan. T responded that little weight should be given to Local Plan as it needed to be modified to conform to the structure plan. The appeal was dismissed. T applied to the High Court under Town and Country Planning Act 1990 s288 on three points, that the Inspector had taken into account the draft local plan, that he had given too much weight to the structure plan policy and that he had taken into account another appeal before the SoS and that these three factors had vitiated the decision. The application was dismissed.