Lodgers or tenants?
Language: English Series: Independent ; 28/6/89 p8Publication details: 1989Subject(s): Summary: In Aslan v Murphy No 1 and No 2 ; Wynne v Duke CA 27 June 1989 it was held that if an agreement between the owner of premises and the occupier was not a sham, in deciding whether the occupier was a lodger or a tenant, the court should consider whether in the light of the factual situation, its provisions were part of the true bargain between the parties or were pretences.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | WB2525-18 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 66980-1001 |
In Aslan v Murphy No 1 and No 2 ; Wynne v Duke CA 27 June 1989 it was held that if an agreement between the owner of premises and the occupier was not a sham, in deciding whether the occupier was a lodger or a tenant, the court should consider whether in the light of the factual situation, its provisions were part of the true bargain between the parties or were pretences.