Lehmann and another v Herman
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1993) 16 EG 124-127(4)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: ChD 16 October 1992. Hearing of an originating summons by L to determine the validity of a notice London Building Acts (Amendment) Act 1939 s47, served on behalf of H. At issue was whether notice given on behalf of one joint tenant only, was valid. L questioned the validity of the notice arguing that it should have been given on behalf of H and his wife as joint tenants, and not on behalf of H alone. Held, the notice was invalid. H and his wife would constitute the "building owner" under the 1939 Act for the purpose of serving a notice under s47.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS48565 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 67376-1001 |
ChD 16 October 1992. Hearing of an originating summons by L to determine the validity of a notice London Building Acts (Amendment) Act 1939 s47, served on behalf of H. At issue was whether notice given on behalf of one joint tenant only, was valid. L questioned the validity of the notice arguing that it should have been given on behalf of H and his wife as joint tenants, and not on behalf of H alone. Held, the notice was invalid. H and his wife would constitute the "building owner" under the 1939 Act for the purpose of serving a notice under s47.