Bamford v British Coal Corporation
Language: English Series: Rating & Valuation Reporter ; 33(4) May 1993, 69-74(6)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: LT 14 October 1992. Compensation under Coal Mining (Subsidence) Act 1957 for the difference between the value of a leasehold interest in a property before subsidence damage and the value later when sold was determined. It was found that the corporation was unable to prove that the damage was not caused by mining subsidence. The damage notice was held to be valid and the corporation`s contention that the property should have been repaired rather than sold was rejected.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS48847 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 68800-1001 |
LT 14 October 1992. Compensation under Coal Mining (Subsidence) Act 1957 for the difference between the value of a leasehold interest in a property before subsidence damage and the value later when sold was determined. It was found that the corporation was unable to prove that the damage was not caused by mining subsidence. The damage notice was held to be valid and the corporation`s contention that the property should have been repaired rather than sold was rejected.