Image from Google Jackets

Connaught Restaurants Ltd v Indoor Leisure Ltd

Language: English Series: New Law Journal ; 143(6613) 13 August 1993, 1188-1189(2)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: CA 19 July 1993. By an underlease the landlords (L) demised premises to the tenants (C) on terms which included a covenant by C to pay the rent `without any deduction`. The premises were severely flooded which caused major disruption to C`s business. Most of the damage was as a result of breaches by L of their covenants in the underlease. C withheld the rent. The amount of damage for which they were liable for breach of their covenants exceeded the amount of any rent accruing. L brought an action to recover the outstanding rent. The ORC gave judgement in L`s favour in the action for unpaid rent amounting to £247,500 but also held in favour of C for their counterclaim for damages for breach of covenant amounting to £488,000. L appealed. It was held that a covenant in a lease that rent is to be paid without deduction is not sufficiently clear to exclude the tenants equitable right of set-off for damage caused by breach of covenant by the landlord.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article ABS49190 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 70294-1001

CA 19 July 1993. By an underlease the landlords (L) demised premises to the tenants (C) on terms which included a covenant by C to pay the rent `without any deduction`. The premises were severely flooded which caused major disruption to C`s business. Most of the damage was as a result of breaches by L of their covenants in the underlease. C withheld the rent. The amount of damage for which they were liable for breach of their covenants exceeded the amount of any rent accruing. L brought an action to recover the outstanding rent. The ORC gave judgement in L`s favour in the action for unpaid rent amounting to £247,500 but also held in favour of C for their counterclaim for damages for breach of covenant amounting to £488,000. L appealed. It was held that a covenant in a lease that rent is to be paid without deduction is not sufficiently clear to exclude the tenants equitable right of set-off for damage caused by breach of covenant by the landlord.