CIL Securities Ltd v Briant Champion Long
Language: English Series: Estates Gazette ; (1993) 42 EG 281-286(6)Publication details: 1993Subject(s): Summary: ChD 5 February 1993. The defendants (B) were appointed to negotiate rent reviews in respect of four properties. They gave advice about the appropriate rent levels but subsequently the appellants (C) claimed the levels settled with their tenants were below the market levels which could have been obtained if referred to arbitration or an expert. C claimed damages. C`s claim was "held" as B did not show the required degree of care and diligence in reviewing comparable evidence.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS49518 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 71673-1001 |
ChD 5 February 1993. The defendants (B) were appointed to negotiate rent reviews in respect of four properties. They gave advice about the appropriate rent levels but subsequently the appellants (C) claimed the levels settled with their tenants were below the market levels which could have been obtained if referred to arbitration or an expert. C claimed damages. C`s claim was "held" as B did not show the required degree of care and diligence in reviewing comparable evidence.