Pleading and proving Barclays Bank v O`Brien claims
Language: English Series: Solicitors` Journal ; 141(25) 27 June 1997, 626-628(3)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: Examines the effects of the CA decision in "Barclays Bank v Boulter" (1997 2 All ER 1002) over the earlier "Barclays Bank v O`Brien" (1993 4 All ER 417) case, concerning a mortgagor`s ability to possess the equitable right to set aside the legal charge or surety contract relied upon by the mortgagee, as a result of a wrongdoing by a third party.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS57383 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 79547-1001 |
Examines the effects of the CA decision in "Barclays Bank v Boulter" (1997 2 All ER 1002) over the earlier "Barclays Bank v O`Brien" (1993 4 All ER 417) case, concerning a mortgagor`s ability to possess the equitable right to set aside the legal charge or surety contract relied upon by the mortgagee, as a result of a wrongdoing by a third party.