Extrudakerb (Maltby Engineering) Ltd v White Mountains Quarries Ltd
Language: English Series: Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal ; July 1997, 262-270(9)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: QBD 24 April 1996. Concerns a sub contract whereby the plaintiff undertook to lay some water channels for the defendant, the main contractor. A letter by the defendant stated that this subcontract would be the FCEC form of subcontract which contains an arbitration clause. Disputes arose and the plaintiff commenced court proceedings claiming payment for work done and charges allegedly due under the subcontract. The defendant sought a stay to arbitration but the plaintiff appealed on the grounds that the contract did not contain an arbitration clause. "Held".| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS57416 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 80314-1001 |
QBD 24 April 1996. Concerns a sub contract whereby the plaintiff undertook to lay some water channels for the defendant, the main contractor. A letter by the defendant stated that this subcontract would be the FCEC form of subcontract which contains an arbitration clause. Disputes arose and the plaintiff commenced court proceedings claiming payment for work done and charges allegedly due under the subcontract. The defendant sought a stay to arbitration but the plaintiff appealed on the grounds that the contract did not contain an arbitration clause. "Held".