Image from Google Jackets

Grant v Broadland Properties Estates Ltd

Language: English Series: Scots Law Times ; 1997 SLT 1030-1036(7)Publication details: 1997Subject(s): Summary: First Division. 13 February 1997. Rent properly payable - obligation on tenant in lease to install drainage scheme - obligation implemented by tenant - whther obligation incumbent on landlord in terms of statute - time as at which validity of obligation to be determined - whether drainage scheme a tenant`s improvement to be left out of account in determining rent. Arbitration to determine rent - appeal to Land Court against award of arbiter - whther competent to raise such issue on appeal. Jurisdiction - Land Court - agricultural holding - arbitration to determine rent - appeal against award of arbiter - appeal raising question as to liability of landlord in relation to fixed equipment on holding and whether or not tenant had carried out works which properly ought to have been done by landlord - whether Land Court had jurisdiction to determine question of liability of landlord in appeal against arbiter`s rental award.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Law report London Journal article E86879 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 81276-1001

First Division. 13 February 1997. Rent properly payable - obligation on tenant in lease to install drainage scheme - obligation implemented by tenant - whther obligation incumbent on landlord in terms of statute - time as at which validity of obligation to be determined - whether drainage scheme a tenant`s improvement to be left out of account in determining rent. Arbitration to determine rent - appeal to Land Court against award of arbiter - whther competent to raise such issue on appeal. Jurisdiction - Land Court - agricultural holding - arbitration to determine rent - appeal against award of arbiter - appeal raising question as to liability of landlord in relation to fixed equipment on holding and whether or not tenant had carried out works which properly ought to have been done by landlord - whether Land Court had jurisdiction to determine question of liability of landlord in appeal against arbiter`s rental award.