To name or not to name?
Language: English Series: Building ; 263(8026) 13 February 1998, 38(1)Publication details: 1998Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- DISPUTE RESOLUTION
- HOUSING GRANTS CONSTRUCTION AND REGENERATION ACT 1996
- SCHEME FOR CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ARBITRATION
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS58239 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 84281-1001 |
Under the new Construction Act parties involved in disputes have the right to go to adjudication. This article argues the case for and against naming the adjudicator in the contract.