Eagleview v Worthgate Ltd and Capital Prime Properties Ltd
Language: English Series: New Property Cases ; [1998] NPC 26(3)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: ChD 12 February 1998. An action on a distant contract survives a challenge that the attempt to enforce it is an abuse of process. The court refuses to vacate Cautions under the Land Registration Act 1925, but forces the purchaser to bring the purchase price into court as a condition of proceeding. A technical nullity under the foreign law under which the plaintiff was incorporated is ignored. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL - DO NOT PHOTOCOPY.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X90122 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 84574-1001 |
ChD 12 February 1998. An action on a distant contract survives a challenge that the attempt to enforce it is an abuse of process. The court refuses to vacate Cautions under the Land Registration Act 1925, but forces the purchaser to bring the purchase price into court as a condition of proceeding. A technical nullity under the foreign law under which the plaintiff was incorporated is ignored. HEADNOTE FROM JOURNAL - DO NOT PHOTOCOPY.