Peterborough CC v H&H Holman Properties Ltd
Language: English Series: Planning Appeal Decisions ; (1998) 13 PAD 192-203(12)Publication details: 1998Subject(s): Summary: Failure to give notice of decision within prescribed period - outline application - demolition of existing mixed use buildings and the erection of new retail warehouse and leisure units - fallback scheme - factory outlet centre - comparison with appeal proposals - s106 Unilateral Undertaking - bus services - whether adverse effect on vitality and viability of city centre and other centres - accessibility by choice of means of transport - grouping of retail facilities - balance of facilities - balance of benefits and harm from proposals - further issue raised by Council in post-inquiry representations - not justified, therefore not taken into account - cumulative effect of proposal - PPGs6 and 13 - sequential approach neccessary. HEADNOTE.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | X91571 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 86058-1001 |
Failure to give notice of decision within prescribed period - outline application - demolition of existing mixed use buildings and the erection of new retail warehouse and leisure units - fallback scheme - factory outlet centre - comparison with appeal proposals - s106 Unilateral Undertaking - bus services - whether adverse effect on vitality and viability of city centre and other centres - accessibility by choice of means of transport - grouping of retail facilities - balance of facilities - balance of benefits and harm from proposals - further issue raised by Council in post-inquiry representations - not justified, therefore not taken into account - cumulative effect of proposal - PPGs6 and 13 - sequential approach neccessary. HEADNOTE.