Medforth v Blake and others.
Series: Estates Gazette Law Reports ; [1999] 29 EG 119-126(8)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: CA 26 May 1999. M ran a pig-farming business and in 1982 charged his farm to Midland Bank in order to secure a loan and overdraft. In 1984 the bank appointed B as a receiver to manage the farming business. In 1988 the debt was paid off and the receivers discharged. M then brought proceedings against B alleging that they had failed to take advantage of discounts on pig feed and were therefore in breach of duty of care. Judge held that B owed M an equitable duty of care. B appealed. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS60993 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 101547-1001 |
CA 26 May 1999. M ran a pig-farming business and in 1982 charged his farm to Midland Bank in order to secure a loan and overdraft. In 1984 the bank appointed B as a receiver to manage the farming business. In 1988 the debt was paid off and the receivers discharged. M then brought proceedings against B alleging that they had failed to take advantage of discounts on pig feed and were therefore in breach of duty of care. Judge held that B owed M an equitable duty of care. B appealed. Appeal dismissed.