Stevens v Gullis
Series: Estates Gazette Law Reports ; [1999] 44 EG 143-147(5)Publication details: 1999Subject(s): Summary: CA 27 July 1999. The claimant builder (ST) made a claim against the defendant (G) for payment for work and materials which had been certified by G's architect. G then counterclaimed, based on schedules drawn up by a building surveyor (S) for defective work and delays. An order was made for a meeting of experts, however S failed to adequately respond following the meeting, and was debarred from acting as an expert witness in the proceedings between ST and G and between G and his architect, although he could give evidence as to fact. G appealed. "Held" Save that S should not give evidence of fact, appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS61603 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 102433-1001 |
CA 27 July 1999. The claimant builder (ST) made a claim against the defendant (G) for payment for work and materials which had been certified by G's architect. G then counterclaimed, based on schedules drawn up by a building surveyor (S) for defective work and delays. An order was made for a meeting of experts, however S failed to adequately respond following the meeting, and was debarred from acting as an expert witness in the proceedings between ST and G and between G and his architect, although he could give evidence as to fact. G appealed. "Held" Save that S should not give evidence of fact, appeal dismissed.