Landlord and tenant
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] EGCS 37 (25/03/2000)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: "Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd" Central London County Court, 28 February 2000. M was the lessee of a town house and mews dwelling and sought to enfranchise one or both under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The mews house was undercut by a basement extending from the house and at issue was whether both buildings constituted a single property. "Held" each building was a house in its own right, although they were not structurally separated and were therefore capable of being excluded by the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(2).| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3613-20 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 105056-1001 |
"Malekshad v Howard de Walden Estates Ltd" Central London County Court, 28 February 2000. M was the lessee of a town house and mews dwelling and sought to enfranchise one or both under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The mews house was undercut by a basement extending from the house and at issue was whether both buildings constituted a single property. "Held" each building was a house in its own right, although they were not structurally separated and were therefore capable of being excluded by the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s2(2).