Lambeth LBC v Vincent and persons unknown
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] 19 EG 145-153(8)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: ChD 17 February 2000. The validity of the notice to complete served by claimant council L to defendant V was challenged on the grounds that 1) the writ claiming forfeiture put L's title in issue (2) L was in breach of contract in offering a draft transfer providing for a limited rather than a full title guarantee (3) the registered title was good and not an absolute title and 4) there was no ministerial consent as required by the Housing Act 1985. Held that the notice to complete was validly served. L was entitled to rescind the contract when the notice to complete expired on 28 November 1996.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS62371 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 106002-1001 |
ChD 17 February 2000. The validity of the notice to complete served by claimant council L to defendant V was challenged on the grounds that 1) the writ claiming forfeiture put L's title in issue (2) L was in breach of contract in offering a draft transfer providing for a limited rather than a full title guarantee (3) the registered title was good and not an absolute title and 4) there was no ministerial consent as required by the Housing Act 1985. Held that the notice to complete was validly served. L was entitled to rescind the contract when the notice to complete expired on 28 November 1996.