Floyer-Acland and others v Osmond
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] 22 EG 134-138(5)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: CA 6 April 2000. Respondent tenant, O, held an agricultural tenancy from the appellant landlords, F. Clause 3 of the tenancy agreement allowed the landlords to search and remove sand and gravel from the land on giving not less than 3 months notice. The landlords were granted planning permission for the winning and working of sand and gravel. F then gave the tenant a notice to quit 43.4 acres of the agricultural holding. O sought an arbitrator's decision regarding the validity of the notice to quit. The recorder decided the notice to quit was invalid. F appealed and O cross-appealed. Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS62514 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 106420-1001 |
CA 6 April 2000. Respondent tenant, O, held an agricultural tenancy from the appellant landlords, F. Clause 3 of the tenancy agreement allowed the landlords to search and remove sand and gravel from the land on giving not less than 3 months notice. The landlords were granted planning permission for the winning and working of sand and gravel. F then gave the tenant a notice to quit 43.4 acres of the agricultural holding. O sought an arbitrator's decision regarding the validity of the notice to quit. The recorder decided the notice to quit was invalid. F appealed and O cross-appealed. Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed.