Building contract loss
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] EGCS 102 (12/08/2000)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: "Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd", HL 27 July 2000. Appellent M was engaged by respondent P as the main contractor on land belonging sister company UIPL. UIPL was obtaining warranties under a separate deed made with M. P claimed damages for defective work and delay. CA decision for P to recover substantial damages. M appealed to HL that P should not recover anything more than nominal damages. Appeal allowed. (Full judgment available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldjudinf.htm)| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3632-06 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 107826-1001 |
"Alfred McAlpine Construction Ltd v Panatown Ltd", HL 27 July 2000. Appellent M was engaged by respondent P as the main contractor on land belonging sister company UIPL. UIPL was obtaining warranties under a separate deed made with M. P claimed damages for defective work and delay. CA decision for P to recover substantial damages. M appealed to HL that P should not recover anything more than nominal damages. Appeal allowed. (Full judgment available on http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld/ldjudinf.htm)