Gilje and others v Charlegrove Securities Ltd
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2000] 4 November 2000, 44 EG 148-153(6)Publication details: 2000Subject(s): Summary: LT 15 August 2000. G were lessees of 4 flats in a building. The landlord (C), owner of the headlease, sought to recover a notional rent in respect of 1994/5 for the flat occupied by the caretaker. In respect of the years 1995-1998 C increased the caretaker's wages, in order to cover the rent of the flat. G challenged their liability to pay various items in the service charge by an application to the LVT. The LVT decided the charged sum and the increased wages were reasonable. G appealed. Held, C was not entitled to recover, by either of the methods used, a notional rent in respect of the caretaker's flat.| Item type | Current library | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | 1 | Available | 109191-1001 |
LT 15 August 2000. G were lessees of 4 flats in a building. The landlord (C), owner of the headlease, sought to recover a notional rent in respect of 1994/5 for the flat occupied by the caretaker. In respect of the years 1995-1998 C increased the caretaker's wages, in order to cover the rent of the flat. G challenged their liability to pay various items in the service charge by an application to the LVT. The LVT decided the charged sum and the increased wages were reasonable. G appealed. Held, C was not entitled to recover, by either of the methods used, a notional rent in respect of the caretaker's flat.