Vehicle for change
Series: Building ; 266(8178) 30 March 2001, 54(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Counters criticisms of PPC2000, which merges partnering agreements and building contracts into one document. Argues that it describes the project-partnering process in accessible language, and clarifies the nature of each party's duties, and when these should be done. Rejects the claim that PPC2000 is only suitable for housing associations and the public sector. Notes that it is already being used by teams that include clients such as British Aerospace and private developers.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS63651 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 111794-1001 |
Counters criticisms of PPC2000, which merges partnering agreements and building contracts into one document. Argues that it describes the project-partnering process in accessible language, and clarifies the nature of each party's duties, and when these should be done. Rejects the claim that PPC2000 is only suitable for housing associations and the public sector. Notes that it is already being used by teams that include clients such as British Aerospace and private developers.