Image from Google Jackets

Zero in on adjudication

By: Contributor(s): Series: Estates Gazette ; (0125) 23 June 2001, 152(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: Outlines the debate surrounding the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on adjudication contrasting the ruling in "Austin Hall Building Ltd v Buckland Securities Ltd" with extra-judicial comment made by Judge Thornton and noting that conflicting views may lead to inconsistency in the courts' approach. Observes that challenges to an adjudicators award are unlikely to succeed except on the grounds of jurisdiction and natural justice, and that under the Human Rights Act 1996 s6 adjudicators are not public authorities. Case law.
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Copy number Status Barcode
Journal article London Journal article X113381 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) 1 Available 113381-1001

Outlines the debate surrounding the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on adjudication contrasting the ruling in "Austin Hall Building Ltd v Buckland Securities Ltd" with extra-judicial comment made by Judge Thornton and noting that conflicting views may lead to inconsistency in the courts' approach. Observes that challenges to an adjudicators award are unlikely to succeed except on the grounds of jurisdiction and natural justice, and that under the Human Rights Act 1996 s6 adjudicators are not public authorities. Case law.