Easement and prescription
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 28 EG 143 (CS) (14/7/01)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: "Smith v Brudenell-Bruce and another", ChD 2 July 2001, examined a claim to a right of way based upon the Prescription Act 1832 and the doctrine of lost modern grant. The defendant (B) had disputed the claimant (S)'s use of the right of way after tolerating its use for 23 years. S continued use of the track and later claimed the right of way was 'as of right'. The claim succeeded under the doctrine of lost modern grant.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | WB3728-01 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113681-1001 |
"Smith v Brudenell-Bruce and another", ChD 2 July 2001, examined a claim to a right of way based upon the Prescription Act 1832 and the doctrine of lost modern grant. The defendant (B) had disputed the claimant (S)'s use of the right of way after tolerating its use for 23 years. S continued use of the track and later claimed the right of way was 'as of right'. The claim succeeded under the doctrine of lost modern grant.