Nothing by halves
Series: Building ; 266(8193) 13 July 2001, 51(1)Publication details: 2001Subject(s):- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION-ADJUDICATORS
- FAREBROTHER BUILDING SERVICES LTD V FROGMORE INVESTMENTS LTD
- CONSTRUCTION DISPUTES
- TECSA ADJUDICATION RULES
- JURISDICTION
- MANAGEMENT-DISPUTE AVOIDANCE, MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-DISPUTE MANAGEMENT AND RESOLUTION-ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION-ADJUDICATION
- TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION SOLICITORS ASSOCIATION
- Dispute resolution
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | London Journal article | ABS64260 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 113974-1001 |
Examines the case of "Farebrother Building Services Ltd v Frogmore Investments Ltd" to see what happens if an adjudicator makes a mistake and does not take into account part of the defence, whether the decision can be overturned.