Notting Hill Housing Trust v Brackley and another
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 35 EG 106-110(5)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: CA 24 April 2001. A and B held a joint tenancy. A left the premises and served a notice to quit on landlord (C). C commenced possession proceedings on B. B claimed A was in breach of Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 s11, and thus that the notice to quit was void. Judge held notice to quit was valid. B appealed, contending that under s11 the service of a notice to quit was the exercise of a function that required consultation between joint tenants. Held that the 1996 Act had not affected the Law of Property Act 1925 s26. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS64574 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 114668-1001 |
CA 24 April 2001. A and B held a joint tenancy. A left the premises and served a notice to quit on landlord (C). C commenced possession proceedings on B. B claimed A was in breach of Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 s11, and thus that the notice to quit was void. Judge held notice to quit was valid. B appealed, contending that under s11 the service of a notice to quit was the exercise of a function that required consultation between joint tenants. Held that the 1996 Act had not affected the Law of Property Act 1925 s26. Appeal dismissed.