Barclays Bank plc v Bee and another
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2001] 37 EG 153-158(6)Publication details: 2001Subject(s): Summary: CA 10 July 2001. Concerned the serving by landlord (L) of two conflicting notices to quit, under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25. Notice A sought to terminate the tenancy, but did not specify on what grounds, whilst B stated any application for a new tenancy would not be opposed. The tenant's solicitor sought confirmation of whether any application would be opposed. L served a third notice (C) clarifying that any application would be opposed. Judge held that notice C was the valid notice. The tenant appealed. CA upheld CC's decision that C was the only valid notice. Appeal dismissed.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London Journal article | ABS64575 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 114669-1001 |
CA 10 July 2001. Concerned the serving by landlord (L) of two conflicting notices to quit, under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 s25. Notice A sought to terminate the tenancy, but did not specify on what grounds, whilst B stated any application for a new tenancy would not be opposed. The tenant's solicitor sought confirmation of whether any application would be opposed. L served a third notice (C) clarifying that any application would be opposed. Judge held that notice C was the valid notice. The tenant appealed. CA upheld CC's decision that C was the only valid notice. Appeal dismissed.