Business tenancies
Series: Estates Gazette ; [2002] 01 EG 73 (CS) (5/01/02)Publication details: 2002Subject(s): Summary: "Hazel v Akhtar and another" CA 12 December 2001. Concerned claimant (A's) application for grant of a new tenancy, under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, which had been rejected by landlords (B). Judge rejected A's application, finding them in breach of their repairing covenant and guilty of persistently failing to pay rent on time. A's appeal was allowed. The judge was found to be erring in law; his decision was unduly harsh.| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Law report | London News article | WB3801-38 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 116192-1001 |
"Hazel v Akhtar and another" CA 12 December 2001. Concerned claimant (A's) application for grant of a new tenancy, under Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Part II, which had been rejected by landlords (B). Judge rejected A's application, finding them in breach of their repairing covenant and guilty of persistently failing to pay rent on time. A's appeal was allowed. The judge was found to be erring in law; his decision was unduly harsh.